Towards a multidimensional biodiversity index for national application

  • 1.

    Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • 2.

    Measuring Progress: Towards Achieving the Environmental Dimension of the SDGs (UNEP, 2019).

  • 3.

    Blicharska, M. et al. Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development. Nat. Sustain 2, 1083–1093 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    The Global Risks Report 2020 (World Economic Forum, 2020).

  • 5.

    Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Dasgupta, P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review (HM Treasury, 2021).

  • 7.

    Pascual, U. et al. Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nat. Sustain. 4, 567–572 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    The Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration (IPBES Secretariat, 2018).

  • 9.

    UNEP Frontiers 2016 Report: Emerging Issues of Environment Concern (UNEP, 2016).

  • 10.

    Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2020).

  • 11.

    Tittensor, D. P. et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Global Biodiversity Outlook Vol. 25 (Secretariat of the CBD, 2014).

  • 13.

    Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Improvements to the Red List Index. PLoS ONE 2, e140 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    McRae, L., Deinet, S. & Freeman, R. The diversity-weighted living planet index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12, e0169156 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Pascual, U. et al. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 7–16 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene (UNDP, 2020).

  • 18.

    Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2020—Charting Pathways out of Multidimensional Poverty (UNDP & OPHI, 2020).

  • 19.

    Becker, F. G. et al. Global Slavery Index 2018 (Walk Free Foundation, 2018).

  • 20.

    2020 ITUC Global Rights Index: The World’s Worst Countries for Workers (ITUC, 2020).

  • 21.

    Corruption Perceptions Index 2020 (Transparency International, 2020).

  • 22.

    Soto-Navarro, C. A. et al. Building a Multidimensional Biodiversity Index—A Scorecard for Biodiversity Health (UNEP-WCMC, 2020); https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/building-a-multidimensional-biodiversity-index

  • 23.

    Stiglitz, J. E., Fitoussi, J.-P. & Durand, M. Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance (OECD, 2018).

  • 24.

    Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. The GDP paradox. J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 117–135 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    UNDP Strategic Plan, 2018-2021 (UNDP, 2017).

  • 26.

    Dasgupta, P. Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Costanza, R. et al. Time to leave GDP behind. Nature 505, 283–285 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Raworth, K. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist (Random House, 2017).

  • 29.

    Mazzucato, M. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy (Penguin, 2019).

  • 30.

    Perrings, C. et al. Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: saving natural capital without losing interest. Conserv. Biol. 20, 263–264 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Primmer, E. & Paavola, J. Insurance value of ecosystems: an introduction. Ecol. Econ. 184, 107001 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Jørgensen, S. L., Termansen, M. & Pascual, U. Natural insurance as condition for market insurance: climate change adaptation in agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 169, 106489 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (2011-2020) and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (CBD, 2010).

  • 34.

    Hansen, M. H., Li, H. & Svarverud, R. Ecological civilization: interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Glob. Environ. Change 53, 195–203 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Gruetzmacher, K. et al. The Berlin principles on one health—bridging global health and conservation. Sci. Total Environ. 764, 142919 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).

  • 37.

    2019—Global Report on Food Crises: Joint Analysis for Better Decisions (Food Security Information Network, 2019).

  • 38.

    CBD/WG2020/2/4 29 Report of the Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on its Second Meeting (CBD, 2020).

  • 39.

    Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Chan, K. M. A. et al. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1462–1465 (2016).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Chan, K. M. A., Gould, R. K. & Pascual, U. Editorial overview: relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 35, A1–A7 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Convention on Biological Diversity (United Nations, 1992).

  • 44.

    Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain 1, 448–451 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people. Science 366, 255–258 (2019).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M. & Torrisi, G. On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Soc. Indic. Res. 141, 61–94 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators—Methodology and User Guide (OECD, 2008).

  • 49.

    Kumar, P. (ed.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (Earthscan, 2010).

  • 50.

    Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B. & Rockström, J. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol. Soc. 21, 41 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    The Global Goals for Sustainable Development (Global Goals); http://www.globalgoals.org/resources

  • 52.

    Zenghelis, D. et al. Valuing Wealth, Building Prosperity: Wealth Economy Project First Year Report to LetterOne (Bennett Institute for Public Policy, 2020).

  • 53.

    Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615–620 (2012).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Wendling, Z. A. et al. 2020 Environmental Performance Index (Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, 2020).

  • 55.

    Borucke, M. et al. Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol. Indic. 24, 518–533 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Sachs, J. et al. The Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: Sustainable Development Report 2020 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  • 57.

    Usubiago-Liano, A. & Ekins, P. Developing a Novel Index of Strong Environmental Sustainability: Preliminary Results (Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, 2019).

  • 58.

    Acosta, L. A. et al. Green Growth Index 2020—Measuring Performance in Achieving SDG Targets Technical Report No. 16 (GGGI, 2020).

  • 59.

    Agrobiodiversity Index Report 2019: Risk and Resilience (Biodiversity International, 2019).

  • 60.

    Angulo, R., Díaz, Y. & Pardo, R. The Colombian multidimensional poverty index: measuring poverty in a public policy context. Soc. Indic. Res. 127, 1–38 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Watts, K. et al. Ecological time lags and the journey towards conservation success. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 304–311 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar